The benefits and challenges of collecting biodata on remote studies |
|
| Coordinator 1 | Ms Eileen Irvin (Ipsos (UK)) |
The expanding use of biodata in social research presents new opportunities for researchers. While biodata, from saliva and blood samples, to physical measurements, has been used for decades, recent technological advancements allow for remote collection, increasing its potential. Similarly, as more research studies move from face-to-face modes to mixed or self-complete approaches, more studies are trialling the collection of biodata remotely, including during periods where COVID-19 lockdown restrictions meant long-term studies had to attempt alternative collection modes.
This session would explore experiences of collecting remote biodata - such as lateral flow tests, specimen collection (e.g. urine, saliva, or blood samples), activity monitors, and self-reported body measurement. The aim is to explore potential benefits (such as larger sample sizes, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to capture data in real-time within people's natural environments), as well as challenges (such as ethical considerations related to privacy and data security, as well as methodological issues like non-response bias and data quality). Where possible, it would also be useful to compare between remote biodata collection, and in-person biodata collection, to understand differences and the implications for research we conduct.